Plastic pollution: how can we still consider turning back in 2026?

Plastic pollution is accelerating. Science is sounding the alarm. And yet… France is preparing to give it even more power.

Since 2020, the AGEC law has set a clear course: reduce single‑use plastics, limit waste at the source, and protect both human health and biodiversity.

After years of work and commitments, France was finally moving in the right direction.

👉 Today, this progress is under threat.

As part of the Ddadue bill (an adaptation to European law), several amendments tabled in the Senate proposed rolling back these advances, some of them developed with representatives of the plastics industry.

Even though they were rejected in committee, nothing is settled yet: 🔁 they will return for debate during the public session.

The road remains full of obstacles, a clear sign of the power of lobbies willing to do whatever it takes to maintain the status quo.

Among the rollbacks being considered:

❌ postponing the end of single‑use plastic packaging to 2040,

❌ calling into question the 50% reduction in plastic bottles by 2030,

❌ bringing plastic containers back into school cafeterias and healthcare facilities,

❌ the possible return of free plastic bottles in offices and public buildings.

Unacceptable setbacks.

🔵 Science is unequivocal: plastic accumulates, fragments, and contaminates ecosystems and living organisms.

Turning back now would be an ecological and public‑health absurdity.

But one thing is certain:

You, as business leaders, are not condemned to wait.

Your ability to act does not depend on the parliamentary calendar:

➡️ You can move faster than the law.

➡️ You can support low‑impact, sustainable solutions.

➡️ You can align your decisions with scientific reality — not with industrial pressure.

In the face of rollback attempts, redoubling ambition is an act of responsibility.

Reducing plastic is not an option. It is a necessity.

Skip to content